S.K. Tyagi
D.O. F.No.A-12026/18/2009-Ad.I
Director (Hqrs.)
15th January, 2010
Dear
You
are aware that the Government of India has created 12 posts of Income
Tax Ombudsman at 12 stations, namely New Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata,
Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad, Pune, Kanpur, Chandigarh, Bhopal and
Kochi under the Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2006. Selection
to the post of Income Tax Ombudsman is to be made for some vacant/ likely
to be vacant locations i.e. Kochi.
2. The post of Income
Tax Ombudsman is in the Pay Scale of HAG+ Rs. 75500-80000/-. Therefore,
it is requested that names of suitable officers fulfilling the eligibility
criteria mentioned in the Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines, 2006 (copy
enclosed) indicating their preferred locations may be sent by
27.01.2010 to enable selection of Income Tax Ombudsmen.
In case no preference of locations is indicated, it would be presumed
that he/she is willing to be posted in any of the locations. The
applications received after the due date will not be considered and
will be treated as rejected. The nominations should be accompanied
with Cadre clearance, History of postings, Vigilance clearance and ACR
dossiers.
3. Relevant provisions
regarding eligibility, pay scale and tenure of Ombudsman are reproduced
from the guidelines below:-
(i) The Ombudsman
selected shall be a person who has held a post in the Government of
India in the revised Pay Scale of HAG Rs. 67,000-79,000/-(Pre-revised
scale of Rs.22,400-24,500/-) for at least two years and shall preferably
to be a resident of the city where he is proposed to be appointed.
He shall be a serving officer of the Indian Revenue Service (Income
Tax) or if a suitable officer from that service is not available, any
other Group ‘A’ service of the Central Government. When appointed
as Ombudsman, he shall seek retirement from Government service before
entering upon his office as an Ombudsman.
(ii) The Ombudsman
shall be appointed for a tenure of 2 years extendable by one year based
on performance appraisal or till the incumbent attains the age of 63
years, whichever is earlier. There shall be no reappointment.
Performance appraised shall be made by the Committee constituted in
clause 3.1.
Contd….2
-2-
4. You are also requested
to inform the applicants that in case of their appointment by the ACC,
they will not be allowed to decline the appointment. If they decline
the appointment, they will not be considered for any further appointment
outside their cadre for 3 years.
(S.K. Tyagi)
Shri S.S.N.Moorthy,
Chairman,
Central Board of Direct Taxes,
North Block,
New Delhi.
Encls: As above
Copy to
- Shri Shishir Jha, Spokesperson
of CBDT with the request that wide publicity of this vacancy circular
may be given through newspapers and related websites.
- DG (Systems), with the request
that this vacancy circular may be posted on the web site of the CBDT.
- Director, NIC, with the request
that this vacancy circular may be posted on the web site (www.finmin.nic.in) of the Department of Revenue.
- Section Officer (Computer
Cell), Department of Revenue, with the request that this vacancy circular
may be posted on the official web site of the Department of Revenue.
(S.K. Tyagi)
Director (Hqrs.)
The Guidelines are
introduced with the objective of enabling the resolution of complaints
relating to public grievances against the Income Tax Department and
to facilitate the satisfaction or settlement of such complaints.
1. Short title, commencement,
extent and application
- These Guidelines shall be
known as the Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines, 2006.
- They shall come into force
from 1st January, 2006.
- ‘authorized representative’
means a person duly appointed and authorized by a complainant to act
on his behalf and represent him in the proceedings under these guidelines
for consideration of his complaint.
-
‘award’ means an award passed by the Ombudsman in accordance
with these Guidelines.
-
‘complaint’ means a representation in writing or through electronic
means containing an administrative grievance alleging deficiency in
the working of the Income-tax Department as mentioned in clause 9 of
the Guidelines.
- ‘guidelines’
means The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines, 2006.
-
‘income tax authority complained against’
means the junior-most Income Tax officer not below the rank of an Income
Tax Officer who has given the cause of grievance to the complainant.
If the grievance has been caused by an official lower in rank than an
Income Tax Officer, then this term shall mean the officer in the rank
of an Income Tax Officer who is in-charge of such official.
- ‘Ombudsman’ means
any person appointed under Clause 3 of the Guidelines.
- On the recommendations of
a Committee consisting of the Secretary, Department of Revenue in the
Ministry of Finance, the Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes and
the Member (Personnel), Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the Central
Government may appoint one or more persons as Ombudsman.
- The Ombudsman selected shall
be a person who has held a post in the Government of India in the pay
scale of Rs. 22,400 – 525 – 24,500 for at least two years and shall
preferably be a resident of the city where he is proposed to be appointed.
He shall be a serving officer of the Indian Revenue Service (Income
Tax) or if a suitable officer from that service is not available, any
other group ‘A’ service of the Central Government. When appointed
as Ombudsman, he shall seek retirement from Government service before
entering upon his office as an Ombudsman.
- The Ombudsman shall be independent
of the jurisdiction of the Income tax department.
- The Ombudsman shall be appointed
for a tenure of 2 years extendable by one year based on performance
appraisal or till the incumbent attains the age of 63 years, whichever
is earlier. There shall be no reappointment. Performance appraisal
shall be made by the Committee constituted in clause 3.1.
The
Ombudsman shall be allowed pay and allowances as applicable to a Central
Government Officer in the pay scale of Rs. 24,050 – 600 – 26,000.
Any pension to which he is entitled from the Central Government / State
Government shall be deducted from his salary.
The
offices of Income Tax Ombudsman shall initially be located at New Delhi,
Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad, Pune, Kanpur,
Chandigarh, Bhopal and Kochi. The Government may notify additional locations
and appoint an Ombudsman for each location.
Each
Ombudsman shall be provided with a secretariat staff consisting of a
Private Secretary, UDC and a Peon by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
- The Ombudsman shall have the
powers to –
- receive complaints from taxpayers
on any matters specified in clause 9;
- consider such complaints and
facilitate their satisfaction or settlement by agreement, through conciliation
and mediation between the Income Tax Department and the aggrieved parties
or by passing an ‘award’ in accordance with the Guidelines;
- require the Income Tax Authority
complained against or any other related Income Tax Authority to provide
any information or furnish certified copies of any document relating
to the subject matter of the complaint which is or is alleged to be
in its possession; provided that in the event of failure of such authority
to comply with the requisition without any sufficient cause, the Ombudsman
may, if he deems fit, draw the inference that the information, if provided
or copies if furnished, would be unfavourable to the concerned Income
Tax Authority;
- suggest remedial measures
for redressal of grievances; and
- report his findings to the
Secretary, Department of Revenue, GOI and the Chairman CBDT for appropriate
action against erring officials;
- The Ombudsman shall have the
following duties:
- to exercise general powers
of superintendence and control over his office and be responsible for
the conduct of business in his office;
- to maintain confidentiality
of any information or document coming into his knowledge or possession
in the course of discharging his duties and not disclose such information
or document to any person except with the consent of the person furnishing
such information or document; provided that nothing in this clause shall
prevent the Ombudsman from disclosing information or documents furnished
by a party in a complaint to the other party or parties, to the extent
considered by him to be reasonably required to comply with the principles
of natural justice and fair play in the proceedings;
- to protect individual taxpayer’s
rights and reduce taxpayers’ burden;
- to identify issues that increase
the compliance burden or create problems for taxpayers, and to bring
those issues to the attention of the CBDT and the Ministry of Finance;
- to send a monthly report to
the Chairman CBDT and Secretary, Department of Revenue in the Ministry
of Finance recommending appropriate action. The report shall specially
highlight cases where action needs to be taken against erring Income
Tax authorities for their failure to redress the grievance. The report
will be accompanied with primary evidence needed to initiate action
against the delinquent persons;
- to furnish a report every
year containing a general review of activities of the office of the
Ombudsman during the preceding financial year to the Secretary, Department
of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and the Chairman, CBDT along with such
other information as may be considered necessary by him. In the annual
report, the Ombudsman, on the basis of grievances handled by him, will
review the quality of the working of the Income-tax Department and make
recommendations to improve the tax administration; and
- to compile a list of ‘awards’
passed by it between April and March of each financial year in respect
of every Income Tax Authority Complained Against, by name, and report
it to the controlling Chief Commissioners of the officers concerned
and the Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes before the end of April
so that this information can be reflected in the Annual Confidential
Reports of the officers concerned.
- A complaint on any one or
more of the following grounds alleging deficiency in the working of
the Income-tax Department may be filed with the Ombudsman:
- delay in issue of refunds
beyond time limits prescribed by law or under the relevant instructions
issued from time to time by the Central Board of Direct Taxes;
- sending of envelopes without
refund vouchers in cases of refund;
- non adherence to the principle
of ‘First Come First Served’ in sending refunds;
- non acknowledgement of letters
or documents sent to the department;
- non up-dating of demand and
other registers leading to harassment of assessees;
- lack of transparency in identifying
cases for scrutiny and non communication of reasons for selecting the
case for scrutiny;
- delay in disposing cases of
interest waiver;
- delay in disposal of rectification
applications;
- delay in giving effect to
the appellate orders;
- delay in release of seized
books of account and assets, after the proceedings under the Income-tax
Act in respect of the years for which the books of account or other
documents are relevant are completed;
- delay in allotment of permanent
account number (PAN);
- non credit of tax paid, including
tax deducted at source;
- non adherence to prescribed
working hours by Income Tax officials;
- unwarranted rude behaviour
of Income Tax officials with assessees;
- any other matter relating
to violation of the administrative instructions and circulars issued
by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in relation to Income-tax administration.
- Central Board of Direct Taxes
may include any other ground on which a complaint may be filed with
the Ombudsman.
- Any person, who has a grievance
against the Income-tax Department, may, himself or through his authorized
representative, make a complaint against the Income-tax official in
writing to the Ombudsman.
- (a) The complaint shall be
duly signed by the complainant and his authorised representative, if
any, and shall state clearly the name and address of the complainant,
the name of the office and official of the Income-tax Department against
whom the complaint is made, the facts giving rise to the complaint supported
by documents, if any, relied on by the complainant and the relief sought
from the Ombudsman;
- No complaint to the Ombudsman
shall lie unless:-
(a) the complainant
had, before making a complaint to the Ombudsman,
made a written representation to the Income Tax authority superior to
the one complained against and either such authority had rejected the
complaint or the complainant had not received any reply within a period
of one month after such authority had received his representation or
the complainant is not satisfied with the reply given to him by such
authority;
(b) the complaint is made
not later than one year after the complainant has received the reply
of the department to his representation or, in case, where no reply
is received, not later than one year and one month after the representation
to the Income Tax Authority.
- No complaint shall be made
to the Income-tax Ombudsman on an issue which has been or is the subject
matter of any proceeding in an appeal, revision, reference or writ before
any Income-tax Authority or Appellate Authority or Tribunal or Court.
The
Ombudsman shall not be bound by any legal rules of evidence and may
follow such procedure that appears to him to be fair and proper.
The proceedings before the Ombudsman shall be summary in nature.
- As soon as it may be practicable
so to do, the Ombudsman shall cause a notice of the receipt of any complaint
along with a copy of the complaint to be sent to the Income Tax Authority
Complained Against and endeavour to promote a settlement of the complaint
by agreement between the complainant and such authority through conciliation
or mediation;
- For the purpose of promoting
a settlement of the complaint, the Ombudsman may follow such procedure
as he may consider appropriate.
- If a complaint is not settled
by agreement within a period of one month from the date of receipt of
the complaint or such further period as the Ombudsman may consider necessary,
he may pass an award after affording the parties reasonable opportunity
to present their case. He shall be guided by the evidence placed
before him by the parties, the principles of Income Tax law and practice,
directions, instructions and guidelines issued by the Central Board
of Direct Taxes or the Central Government from time to time and such
other factors which in his opinion are necessary in the interest of
justice.
- The ‘award’ passed under
sub-clause (1) above shall be a speaking order consisting of the following
components:
- Directions to the concerned
Income Tax Authority such as performance of its obligations like expediting
delayed matters, giving reasons for decisions and issuing apology to
complainants etc., except a direction affecting the quantum of tax assessment
or imposition of penalties under the Income Tax Act.
- A token compensation amount
not exceeding Rs. 1000/- (Rs. One Thousand only) for the loss suffered
by the complainant.
- Designation of the Income
Tax officer to whom the letter of acceptance of the award is to be communicated
as detailed in clause 13.4.
- A copy of the ‘award’
shall be sent to the complainant and the Income Tax Authority complained
against.
- The ‘award’ shall be binding
on the Income Tax Department and on the complainant provided that an
award shall not be binding on the Income Tax Department unless the complainant
furnishes to it, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt
of a copy of the award, a letter of acceptance of the award in full
and final settlement of his complaint. If the complainant does
not accept the Award passed by the Ombudsman or fails to furnish his
letter of acceptance within the said period of 15 days or within such
time, not exceeding a period of 15 days that may be granted by the Ombudsman,
the award shall lapse and be of no effect.
- Any token compensation given
as a part of the award shall be paid by the Income Tax Department out
of the budget allocated under the head ‘Office Expenses’ of the
office of the Income Tax Authority complained against. Such payments
shall take priority over any other expenditure from this allocation.
- The Income Tax Authority complained
against shall, within one month from the date of the award, comply with
the award and intimate compliance to the Ombudsman.
If
any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of these Guidelines,
the Central Government may make such provisions not inconsistent with
the Income tax Act or the Guidelines as it appears to it to be necessary
or expedient for removing the difficulty.